Hydric Soil Indicators- PART 2

One of the most fundamental and often confusing topics around soils are hydric soil indicators. There are just so many of them. Each regional supplement also has different indicators. Tweaks are often made that are region or sub-region specific. 

The most basic concept surrounding the hydric soil indicators is that they only apply to hydric soils. Now this may seem a bit obvious, but it is critical to the understanding how they work. Non-hydric soils do not exhibit any of the listed indicators. However, if an indicator is present, it tests positive for hydric soils. Once that happens, it is not usual to find multiple indicators in the same soil profile. If there are no indicators present, the soil is not hydric, and no indicators should have been found. This becomes a bit tricky when dealing with remnant hydric soil as shadows of indicators might be present. However, the soil is not actively hydric. The lack of hydrology indicators may help to confirm this.Ā 

The next topic is, ā€œwhat is it we are looking for?ā€ The hydric soil indicators are based upon how three groups of elements respond to the presence of water. It is not just the presence of water, but the anaerobic environment the water creates. These element groups are: 

  • CarbonĀ 
  • Iron and ManganeseĀ 
  • SulfurĀ 

The easiest one to spot is sulfur. The soil stinks like rotten eggs. If you have stinky soil, you meet one of the hydric soil criteria. Iron and manganese are also easy to spot. There is a distinct color change from orange red to grey in the case of reduced iron. The anaerobic environment chemically changes the color of the soil. Manganese tends to turn black in this wet environment. However, the problem with these chemicals is that the color change back to the brighter colors in an aerobic environment may not happen quickly or at all in some cases. Consequently, you need to make sure that you have an active reducing environment by cross checking your hydrology indicators. 

Carbon is perhaps the trickiest. A simple explanation is that a significant amount of organic material (a.k.a. carbon) is present due to the lack of oxygen in the environment. The soil microbes are not able to break the organic material down because they need oxygen to do this. The more the soil is subjected to anaerobic conditions, the thicker the layer of undigested carbon becomes. The more organic matter, the more likely the soil is hydric. 

To help organize the indicators, the Corps uses the USDA texture classes. Each indicator is grouped based upon itā€™s dominate texture. These include sand, loam, and no specific texture.
Sand is the easiest, the texture is sandy like beach sand. All the indicators have this in common. The funny thing about this one is that the presence of organic matter is a big part of the ā€œSā€ indicators. 

Loam is denoted by the letter ā€œF.ā€ It stands for fine sand or finer. This includes silts and clays. Most of the indicators in the F category related to iron and manganese color changes. 

All soils are the last category and are listed as not specific to any one texture type. Many of the poorly drained organic soil types fall into this category. However stinky soil also is an ā€œAā€ indicator. These are sort of ā€œotherā€ but with a strong emphasis on organic soils. 

One last thought on this soil overview, many of the indicators have thickness requirements. A given soil feature must be a specified thickness to count. It may also have to occur at a specified depth. Otherwise, the feature does not count. You can also combine features, if present, to meet these thickness thresholds. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *